How did life begin? The world evolved from, um, apes, or slime or space gas, or something like that , right? Wait, is that what Darwin claimed? What does the theory of evolution claim anyway? Does Darwin explain the origin of life? Actually, no. But you have been manipulated into thinking that evolution holds the answer to the great questions of life. The truth is that nobody knows the answer to how life began, other than we know that it did begin. It has not existed forever. And therefore it had a starting point. But have you even thought about that? Probably not. You have been socially engineered into not asking questions.
Social control is a broad term that includes all the ways that a society structures life to make it safer, more productive, and more prosperous. It includes the systems and methods that we know are controlling us, such as laws and institutions, and the ones we don’t think about, like manufactured crises and censorship.
In this article I argue that Darwin’s theory of evolution was used as a tool at a specific time in history by social engineers to nudge the public mind from faith in God to faith in the science that the state deems to be true. My belief is that this had to happen in order to move the world closer to the final stage. Those with true faith will continue to believe in God despite the strong pressure to conform.
Your worldview includes your beliefs about the purpose of life, where you came from, how the world was created, and what happens after death. These beliefs exert a powerful, though often subconscious, influence on your life.
A person’s worldview significantly influences their life choices in various ways. A worldview is essentially a set of beliefs, values, assumptions, and perspectives that shape how an individual perceives and interprets the world around them. These values guide us in making decisions. When we go against our beliefs, we feel cognitive dissonance, so we tend to make choices that make us feel comfortable. Worldview also guides our choices in relationships, careers, and how we spend our money.
Worldview plays a crucial role in ethical and moral dilemmas. It serves as a framework for evaluating what is right or wrong, just or unjust, and guides individuals in making ethical choices. Worldview is often shaped by cultural and societal norms, and it, in turn, reinforces and perpetuates those norms.
A person’s worldview can determine whether they conform to or challenge these norms. For example, someone with a traditional worldview might adhere closely to cultural norms, while someone with a progressive worldview may advocate for change and social justice.
Believing that ‘science’ is the highest form of knowledge means that you have assimilated that socially engineered idea into your worldview.
According to ChatGPT, pre-modern science was characterized by a mix of empirical observation, superstition, mythology, and religious beliefs, while modern science is characterized by its systematic, empirical, and naturalistic approach, leading to significant advancements in our understanding of the natural world and its practical applications. The crucial difference in the supposed value of modern science is the scientific method.
But does modern science actually follow the scientific method? ChatGPT says: science may rely on reasoning and theoretical frameworks when direct empirical evidence is difficult to obtain or when the phenomena being studied are not directly observable or measurable.
The fact is that science is the PURSUIT of understanding and it often uses theories and human reasoning to make assumptions and deductions when lacking actual evidence.
But the public is taught that we should trust the science, as if it is proven fact. This is nothing different than trusting in God or anything else that we can only prove by indirect evidence. Yet the powers that be want you to think that science is true and God isn’t.
Thanks to the ability of new technology to reveal the intricate details of much smaller organisms, it has become much more difficult to support Darwin’s idea that humans and animals developed from random evolutionary processes. And thanks to honest scientists, faulty research that the media claims proves evolution is being exposed. All you have to do it look for it.
It doesn’t take much effort to debunk Darwin. But like many lies spread by the media, his theory was purposely popularized at a pivotal time in history. The 1850s were a time of social upheaval due to the industrial revolution. Social engineers, bankers, and industrialists needed easily controlled workers.
The popular press was used to change the worldview of adults who actually read books and newspapers, and the public schools took care of the children. It only took one hundred years to switch the world over from creationism to evolution with zero actual evidence.
The same thing is being done to day in the public mind to make you think that the human body has optional and replaceable parts. The press doesn’t come up with these ideas, they simply use them to sell papers.
This article has some good examples of how the press helped spread Darwin’s theory simply by putting the idea into the public mind. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0115-6 The powers that be know that most people do not read scientific articles or can’t understand them.
They know thanks to big data that today most internet users don’t read beyond the headline or first paragraph. So they use the press to control the public mind with fake news all day long without worrying that they will be exposed. Of course there are exceptions and the alternative media is working hard to debunk the fake media.
But sadly, most people don’t even question the theory of evolution today because the brainwashing campaign has been so effective. And many do not even think about science enough to realize that Darwin did not posit a theory that could explain the origin of life itself.
This is the question that certain interested parties want you to think has been settled, when it definitely hasn’t. Darwinism does not explain the origin of life in the universe. This is another subject that scientists are still exploring daily.
Not everyone believes in Darwinism or has abandoned their faith in God as creator. But many would be afraid to admit that to their co-workers or fellow students for fear of appearing uneducated. People have been successfully censored on a topic that by it’s very nature cannot be proven, the origin of life. And because most people think of science as something outside their field of expertise, they don’t feel qualified to even discuss the topic.
The truth is that you are just as qualified as any scientist to guess how the world was created and even more so if you have studied the Bible. So don’t be afraid to speak up.
But my question for you is , why do you think they work SO HARD to make you think that evolution explains away God? Why do they want you to abandon your faith in an eternal, self-existing creator? Why do they spend trillions of dollars keeping this narrative going in the media and schools and teaching our children and college students that this world evolved by chance, that there is no purpose for your life apart from the material world, and that science has proven these lies?

Great post, Paula! To answer your closing questions, the goal is control, and if that takes getting people to believe lies, so be it. But it’s hard controling people and getting them to answer to you, when they believe they ultimately answer to a higher power. So, the mortal “powers that be” have to get the population to believe THEY are the highest authority, and that takes getting God out of the way.
I agree. This article, https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/how-darwins-theory-changed-the-world, which I just discovered, also makes a good point that when people reject God as creator, they are freed from moral restraint. So Darwinism opens the door for guilt-free sex, drugs, and every indulgence. I don’t recommend the website itself or the church, but the article is good.
Not sure I agree with the term “guilt free.” It’s what they want, but the Lord has given each of us a conscience that dies hard. I’m guessing a lot of these people think they’re living the “guilt-free” life, and they can’t understand why they’re miserable. (But then, of course, the “influencers” then come in claiming to have all the answers, if only we would pay them or vote for them.
True. That subconscious guilt helps sell the products that make you feel better. Although, I do think some, not most, people are hardened and no longer feel guilt when they sin. Did you see the quote by Aldous Huxley?
Yep. Those individuals you describe are, I think, what the Bible describes as having their consciences seared with a hot iron. Burns and scars do leave us numb. People have to rebell long and hard to get to that stage, but it happens. 😕
Great post.
This is the answer to your questions:
Fyodor Dostoievski: If God does not exist, everything is permissible
It’s about power. Tyrants hate moral absolutes because they want to do whatever they please.
Laws mean whatever they want them to mean. No more objective truth.
A population of godless people will put up less resistence to those in power.
Perfect